SUMMARY OF "SOCIAL NETWORKING AS AN EDUCATIONAL TOOL"


Teachers have attempted to combine various types of media into educational tools such as television, artificial intelligence, computer-based training, or asynchronous computer conferencing throughout the history of teaching and learning in order to improve education. Social networking, which arose from the popularity of social software, is one of the most recent trends in this subject. Social networking is an educational tool which can be implemented into course designs to generate an interactive learning environment. It is critical to recognize that social software tools can be advantageous in the vast majority of cases. Web 2.0 tools can be used to build a natural learning environment by connecting contents and websites, allowing other individuals to access a large amount of related data. There are some distinguishing aspects of social networking sites:

·         User profile, which includes information such as age, sex, and interests.

·         A social network that can be visited and is openly stated. Making links with other people's profiles, such as friends and acquaintances.

·         Public comments that are semi-consistent. Ability to leave comments on other people's profiles.

In education, user-generated content encourages students to be active while learning, collaborate in groups, and be a part of a community, all of which boost motivation. The ability to draw a line between amusement and education, on the other hand, can be difficult for users to achieve. The appropriate use of web 2.0 technology in education, according to Boettcher, addresses this desire for pupils to gain 21st-century abilities. User-generated content, on the other hand, has been criticized for a variety of reasons. The first reason is because, in contrast to traditional methods, adopting web 2.0 tools can result in a deterioration in higher education quality due to unfiltered information. Another concern is that prepared content on web 2.0 sites may cause students to want instant answers and limit their ability to think critically about the subject. One solution to these issues is to integrate informal learning and web 2.0 technologies to teach students critical thinking, site analysis, and proper site usage.

Students have specific qualities, both favorably and adversely, according to research on student behavior when utilizing technology for education:

·         Ability to multitask

·         Ability to learn from pictures, videos

·         Demand for collaborative activities

·         Scanning skills

·         Shorter attention spans

·         Poor text literacy

·         Demand for instant answers

 

With the advancement of technology, researchers, professors, and lecturers, like students in the twenty-first century, have begun to experiment with new methods when conducting research. In comparison to printed books and journals, web 1.0 was less expensive and more accessible in terms of its results, but it lacked true interactivity, collaborative research, and social networking, which are all features of web 2.0 technologies. In the digital technology environment, researchers can generate, exchange, combine, and redesign information.

Once we examine student profiles and cognitive characteristics of today's learners, the gap between their style of thinking and understanding knowledge and that of their forefathers is widening by the day. Contemporary students are born with a plethora of technical instruments, including cell phones, computers, tablets, and the Internet, implying that they have spent their whole lives staring at a screen. According to a study conducted by Prensky, time spent in front of a screen while gaming, online learning, or creating online material may create an evolutionary shift in the brains of young learners. It isn't simply their manner of thinking or their learning habits that have changed. According to a study conducted by Prensky, time spent in front of a screen while gaming, online learning, or creating online material may create an evolutionary shift in the brains of young learners. Collaborative online learning, according to studies, outperforms solo learning in terms of efficiency. Jenkins believes that social networking plays a significant part in collaborative learning, and he urges educators to describe students' new skills.

To summarize, social networking can be one of the most effective educational tools if certain aspects are addressed and rigorously exercised. The correct use of social media and web 2.0 tools, being in a cooperative learning environment, and awareness of the aims and necessary functions of course design such as engaging, networking, sharing, or commenting, are among these considerations.

     REFERENCES: 

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-iTgKTN4se7YvRCSC8Rfk-YwAi6BP75D/view

Comments